11 November 2012 - Bristol City 0 Charlton Athletic 2
At one
point during this dismal performance, unimpressive loanee left-back Matthew
Briggs dashed over towards Charlton’s right-winger as the away side threatened
to break. Seconds before Briggs made
contact, he very clearly remembered that he’d already been booked, and that a
mistimed challenge would reduce City to ten men whilst already 1-0 down. Unable to check his momentum, and not
trusting himself to execute a perfect challenge, Briggs sailed on past his
opponent. This allowed Charlton a 2v3
break which fortunately they didn’t take advantage of.
I wasn’t
annoyed by the lack of skill or technique at that moment – Briggs’ attempted
ball down the wing which swung out of play under no pressure whatsoever had
removed any illusions I had about his ability.
But it was the stupidity of it that got to me. It was plain that the concepts “I have been
booked” and “if that happens again I will be sent off” took a long time to come
together in the young player’s mind.
For this reason, he chose the wrong course of action, and for this reason Charlton were able to create
a goalscoring opportunity.
Briggs is
21, so will have been receiving formal training in football for 12 years or
so. Distribution, tackling ability –
he’ll have been coached in those aspects for most of that time. That they’re still so limited, or that he’s
so little confidence in them, says to me that they aren’t going to get much
better. But it was his inability to think
straight that let him down as much as anything, and I wonder when he was last
coached in that.
One
suspects he hasn’t, that his academic education has been on the back-burner
since he was first taken on by a centre of excellence. The parts of his brain that control
athleticism will have been developed since then, the rest neglected by a
British football coaching system that’s suspicious of intellect.
If he’d
been brought through the ranks at Ajax, for instance, one suspects that he’d
not only be a different player, but a different man. Look at the players Ajax have brought through
– van Basten, Rijkaard, Davids, Bergkamp, Seedorf, most of all Johan
Cruyff. What unites them? Their technique, yes, their faith in it,
absolutely – but also their intelligence, both footballing and otherwise. (We’ll ignore Patrick Kluivert here. No record is 100%)
Cruyff. Greater than any British player there’s ever
been. Keep yer George Best – or at least
come back when he’s installed his own system at two of the greatest clubs in
Europe, and won the European Cup as a manager as well as a player. The mind that did that is the mind that
developed and finessed total football as a player, too. You don’t score his most famous goal through
technique only. You do so by having the
wit to imagine the angle.
This isn’t
to say that what the pundits like to call “football intelligence” doesn’t exist
– this
fantastic interview with Wayne Rooney (by David Winner, whose book Brilliant
Orange covers a lot of this ground far better than I’m capable of) is worth
a read for the way it confounds a lot of prejudices about the intellectual
ability of a player clearly not exposed to much book-learnin’. One prejudice discussed in the article is held
by Alan Shearer, to whom inevitably we must return. It
takes great mental ability, quite possibly the unique way of seeing the world
possessed by geniuses, to play like Rooney.
But I do wonder whether he would be even more the player with the mental
self-discipline to refrain the from needless kicks on opponents which have led
to his absence from some pretty major England games in the past. Given the coddled life he’s led, and the way
that everything that’s seemed meaningful to him must have come pretty easily,
too, it’s not difficult to understand why he’s so prone to frustration. Being challenged academically by something he’s
not inherently good at would surely have been good discipline for the younger
Rooney and I’m convinced he’d be a better player if he’d been given that
training, too. He’d certainly have two
more England caps and might have taken Jamie Carragher’s penalty against Portugal
all those tournaments ago.
Cruyff, of
course, has had his flare-ups too, but they’ve been borne more out of the
intellectual arrogance of a man who knows he’s right, and has wanted to
shape clubs his way and his way only.
When that leads to La Masia and the success of Barcelona it’s a
triumph. When it leads to fallings-out
with figures like Sandro Rosell and Louis van Gaal, it’s perhaps less
helpful. Nevertheless, the demonstration
is clear – Cruyff the intellectual is central to Cruyff the footballing
God. It’s not hard to see, either, why
the brain that planned the new Barcelona could also conceptualise ‘Total
Football’. Compare this, or the adaptation
of Xavi and Iniesta’s smart Spain to a striker-free formation to win the last
European Championships, with Micah Richards being flummoxed at a change from
4-5-1 to 3-5-2. No wonder Mancini,
another dugout thinker, was frustrated with his player’s attitude. But that comes with managing English players,
and is probably why Arsene Wenger left the likes of Englishmen Bould, Dixon and
Adams in place to do the heading and tackling, but gave Ajax old boy Dennis
Bergkamp the most important role in his team – its brain.
Who hasn’t
been impressed with the articulate, insightful punditry of Leonardo, Gianluca
Vialli, or Clarence Seedorf (yep, Ajax again) during international tournaments,
particularly compared with the self-satisfied complacency of the BBC crew in
particular. Our boys’ narrow horizons –
passion is good, zonal marking is bad, foreigners invented diving – are thrown
into sharp relief every couple of years by ex-players who can talk
intelligently about the game in a language other than their own, and dress
pretty damn sharply to boot. It’s a
regular demonstration, hidden in plain sight, of everything that we’re not
doing and every reason why we should.
(Martin O’Neill
isn’t British, but it would be stretching a point to call him a foreign
ex-player. But his famous digression
during punditry into the life and times of screenwriter William Goldman,
followed by his great unfinished line to an unimpressed Shearer, “perhaps if
you spent more time watching films and less...”, encapsulates every bit of this
cultural difference. Why would Shearer
want to talk about films? Why would he
want to go outside the world of football to make his point? The touchline of the pitch is the touchline
of his mind.)
Leonardo,
Vialli, Seedorf, Bergkamp, Cruyff, O’Neill even, all have something else in
common – they played a great deal of their career abroad. British players seem terrified to do this and
I think in part that’s because they aren’t intellectually equipped to do
so. Not in the sense that they’d
struggle with the language, but because the conception of football is totally
different to the one that they’ve been taught from a very early age is the only
one possible. The way to see the world. Travel broadening the mind is all very well and good, but you have
to consider that to be inherently a good thing.
That’s why,
whatever one thinks of Joey Barton’s somewhat tedious “cleverest boy in the
bottom form” social media schtick, he gets a qualified round of applause for
his decision to pursue his career in Ligue 1.
Qualified because we’ll never know how much the 12-game ban affected his
decision, but still – chapeau to that man.
If he thinks his football – no, his general – education is unfinished at
31, and wants to pursue new things, we can only stand impressed at his decision.
I nearly
started to sum up by saying “if only we had a few more people like Joey Barton”. But I don’t want to say things I can’t take
back. Let’s just say it would be nice to
have informed, articulate, worldly commentary on our game coming from English
ex-players once in a while. Because I do
think that when the coaching system neglects the part of the brain in which
there’s most room for expansion, the player and the person both suffer. I think that enough great teams have been intellectual
triumphs to demonstrate that it’s a genuinely important thing, not an optional
extra. I think speed of thought is
trainable just as much as speed of foot is.
And I don’t think it’s a bolt-on.
I think it’s a club’s duty to their player, particularly because those
that don’t win a big contract at 18 are going to find themselves in a position
where they could do with a brain on their shoulders.
One thing,
one thing only, gives me hope that something might happen in this direction.
Last week, Roy Hodgson used the word “polyvalent” to describe Leon Osman. He’s in charge of our best now, and in charge
of the St George’s Park complex that will foster the next generation. He reads long American novels. He’s a polyglot. He spent most of his career overseas. He calls Everton midfielders “polyvalent”. And he’s the boss.
Once more with
feeling: thank God it wasn’t Redknapp. Won’t
somebody, please, think of the children.
I remember Martin O'Neill on the BBC studio panel for the 2006 World Cup, explaining Italy's offside line with reference to the ancient Romans, in particular the triumvirate of Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus.
ReplyDeleteIt earned him the mockery of the others, Alan Hansen in particular being reduced to tears of mirth at the very idea that it might be useful and interesting to learn things, but I was impressed even if they weren't.
I've thought of him as one of us ever since.
Excellent.
DeleteThis is why ITV's pundits were so much better than the BBC's this summer - no O'Neill, OK, but Strachan is as much of a free-associator. Then there's Vieira and Martinez for the continental sophistication. Now that Dixon's joined them they're only an unfortunate injury to Adrian Chiles away from having the best panel in absolutely years.